allgs raped t knifepoint
ev fresh and wont recite in detail
set out in report of pp
liab
dcrt- diff ev diff st proof here p to proe on ev called

here qn wer p proves
acc p nd pp
d does not hv to prvoe anythg mk clr hv no hestn in rejng his ev
clr ev inconsistent with d re coll matters
acc ev pp set out in report in rpref to nay other w
it is not in dispute that sex ic occ
d disp re conset
findings e d
qn of d's
qm

damgs

diff case in which to assess

phys inj strghtfrwrd minor
covers a no. of incidents

poor psych stte- no dmgs for tht
wht occ was that a person in poor state recvd addl psych inj bec of the rape nd the circumstances in which committed
ent to compn for tht inj
ignore other incts except in sofar as mesure inj person state
backgrnd resultd in fragile pers
compounded bl eye inct

confl
if fut p&s 25000
no fut 10,000
set

no aggr or pun damgs
rogrs point & d crt